What is an Endowment?
The public is taught to save for retirement. Institutions are built to last forever. Their playbooks are not the same.
Written in by Thomas Anderson Principal
The retail investor is given a simple framework: contribute to a 60/40 portfolio of public stocks and bonds, and hope it lasts for a 30-year retirement. This framework is not wrong, it is simply a solution for a different, and much simpler, problem.
Behind this, an institutional framework exists that is not designed for 30-year timeframes, but for perpetuity. It is used by the permanent capital of universities, foundations, and sovereign wealth funds.
They don’t use the public 60/40 model. They use the institutional one. This is the Endowment Model.
The common public definition of an endowment is a “rainy day fund” for a university.
This is incorrect. A “rainy day fund” is a static pool of capital. An endowment is not a fund; it is a process.
It is an investment framework engineered to solve the single most difficult problem in finance: perpetuity. Failure to fulfill its mandate in perpetuity is an endowment’s true risk.
The problem is a mathematical one. How do you structure a portfolio to spin off a fixed percentage (e.g., 5%) every year to fund an operating budget, while simultaneously growing the principal faster than inflation… indefinitely?
This must be done through every market crash, inflationary spike, and economic regime. The 60/40 model of public stocks and bonds is not robust enough to solve this problem. It will fail.
A different design is required.
The Endowment Model, famously articulated by David Swensen at Yale, is a different philosophy built on principles that are often the opposite of mainstream financial advice.
A 30-year retirement is a finite problem. Perpetuity is an infinite one.
This infinite time horizon is the endowment’s foundational asset. Because the institution never “retires,” it never needs to liquidate its assets all at once. This allows it to do something the public is taught to fear: embrace illiquidity.
You are taught that liquidity—the ability to sell an asset for cash today—is a feature. From an institutional perspective, liquidity is a cost.
You pay a premium for the privilege of being able to sell your assets at any time, just as everyone else is.
Endowments do the opposite. They sell their patience to the market and, in return, harvest the illiquidity premium. They intentionally lock up capital for 5, 10, or 15 years in assets that the public cannot or will not access, demanding higher potential returns for providing that stable, long-term capital.
These principles—perpetuity and illiquidity—are not just a philosophy. They are what justify the use of the institutional toolkit.
If your time horizon is infinite, you are not limited to the two asset classes of the 60/40. You can build a more robust, truly diversified portfolio.
This is not a 60/40 split. It is a strategic allocation across asset classes designed to weather different economic regimes:
An endowment is not a what. It is a how.
It is not a “fund” you can buy. It is a framework for investment decision-making. It is a governance structure that prioritizes:
You may not be able to buy a venture capital fund tomorrow. But you can begin to adopt the framework. You can stop thinking like a retail investor and start thinking like a steward of permanent capital.
Related posts
The public is taught to save for retirement. Institutions are built to last forever. Their playbooks are not the same.
In the institutional world, our definition of risk is fundamentally different from the one commonly taught to the public. This difference is not semantic; it is the most important chasm separating the two systems.
How can I invest like Yale?